BOOK REVIEW: The Third Life of Grange Copeland (1970)

alice copeland
Alice Walker, author of The Third Life of Grange Copeland

Just a note:

In my final year of university, I looked into slave narratives and the black identity (predominantly by female authors) in literature. I’ve plucked a short excerpt from some of my notes on one of my favourite novels, one that is often overshadowed by the likes of The Colour Purple, scribbled down before a conference paper examination I did towards the end of my degree. This is just a brief deconstruction as to some of the ideas within the novel, but I thought to share as it might be of interest to those looking for some new reads as an ally to BLM or as an individual who wants broaden their understanding/appreciation for black lives, voices and experiences. Please do let me know your thoughts on this book, as I’ve not come into contact with many people who’ve given it a read before and I’m desperate to have a chat about it!

alice walker
In my opinion, this novel eclipses The Colour Purple!

The Third Life of Grange Copeland (1970) explores the repercussions of slavery in Southern America as opposed to the first-hand account of the slave experience.

In terms of a rough plot overview, Grange Copeland is the protagonist, a failing share-cropper who resents the world and in particular, the white people who govern it for him. His ‘first life’ is miserable. The South is synonymous with stasis and the North is represented as the idyllic escape. With a promiscuous wife, a raging alcohol problem and no prospects in terms of building a life that is truly his own in the South, Grange takes off for the North to start his ‘second life’, shedding his family like old snake skin.

His son Brownfield sets off to find his father only to wind up essentially morphing into him, violent and angry at a world he feels he cannot change. As Brownfield descends further into madness, Grange decides to return home, dissatisfied with the offerings of the North. However, he must face the consequences of his actions.

Walker sets the novel in a world where slavery has already been abolished: she draws attention to systemic racism and how this is bequeathed from one generation to another, an awful legacy that is difficult, if at all possible, to escape. Though legislation should empower the black lives in this narrative, the characters still find themselves bound to the prejudiced power dichotomy which sees white folk as superior and black people as their inferior subjects.

The novel evaluates the relationship between the past, present and future. Walker dissects the trauma bequeathed from generation to generation in a familial context: for example, Grange’s hatred trickles down to his son Brownfield, who then in turn inflicts his wrath upon his wife Mem and his children, Daphne, Ornette and Ruth. The novel offers an authentic insight into the tensions within black communities and for this reason I would argue that it serves as a significant milestone in the contemporary female canon, preceding notable works such as Beloved, Roots and The Colour Purple.

Another powerful element of this novel is Walker’s portrayal of the female struggle as the doubly oppressed. I use this term to describe the female struggle because I feel it represents two levels of oppression: race & gender. Female protagonists continue to be bound to violence and subordination, often taking the literal and metaphorical blows from both the emasculated black men within their local communities and the white fellows who continue to dictate so much of their “free” lives.

Of the motivations behind violence, E.L Birch suggests that, ‘In father and son, hatred of white oppression had been internalised to find expression in violence against the women they feel unable to protect.’ (Birch, E.L, 1994: p. 198). The crushing ideals of masculinity bind the men to lives of misery and rage and thus, their families are inevitably dragged to these depths too. We see this in Grange. Grange is resigned to his fate: after years of persecution at the hands of white people, including Shipley (who overlooked the cotton fields at which he worked), Grange resolves to remove himself from interaction with white people altogether. In a world in which he is powerless, Grange must reclaim his sense of power and manhood by belittling those within his own community.

Thematically, the notion of metamorphosis is recurrent in that many characters undergo significant changes. Titular character Grange evolves from a figure overcome with hatred to a dishevelled old man seeking redemption whilst his son Brownfield, initially determined to live a different life to his father, winds up filling the very same shoes.

In terms of salvation, Ruth’s existence in itself serves as a symbol of hope both for Grange and for the local community. The violence embedded in her past is the fuel for her ambition to destroy the divide between whites and blacks in the South.

Ruth Copeland is the youngest of three children. The reader comes to understand that from a young age, Ruth and her siblings are completely dehumanised. Collectively, they grow up in fear. After watching their mother being beaten half-to-death, Walker describes the children as falling asleep, ‘dreaming in chilly exactness of killing that would set them free.’ (Walker, A, 1985: p. 92).

Liberation in this context is only imagined with the death of patriarchal dominance. The role of Master/Slave is clearly established within the Copeland home and whilst Ruth’s older siblings are apprehensive in their approach to their father, the primary oppressor, Ruth is resistant. She stands up against her bully brother from an infantile age, one such incident is outlined: ‘She was the youngest, barely four. “You ain’t nothing but a sonnabit,” she said, and quickly covered herself with her blanket so she wouldn’t feel the first really hard blows Brownfield ever gave her.’ (Walker, A, 1985: p. 108). Ruth mimics the profanity she’s heard from her father since birth and arms herself with it. The expectation is for Ruth to accept a status of passivity but she challenges this from the outset, and represents a break in the status quo, becoming a beacon of hope for future generations.

Grange’s ‘third life’ is his return to the South. He seeks to protect Ruth from the very oppressive forces which have threatened him and considers this to be the fundamental purpose of his ‘third life’, his redemption. This implies that the hostility and hatred is cyclical, that the same fundamental narrative will be perpetuated. Yet, it’s Ruth’s inherently childlike attributes of sensitivity and innocence which provokes in Grange a sense of epiphany, he learns through Ruth, ‘an invaluable lesson about hate; he could only teach hate by inspiring it.’ (Walker, A, 1985: p. 137) and it’s this notion, that he may destroy any chance of Ruth’s future liberation, that Grange adapts.

However, the union between Grange and Ruth is not without its difficulties and this is evident when a discussion is had about Ruth’s ambitions for the future. Whilst Grange envisions her taking over his farm, she dreams of travelling up North. Ruth insists that, “I’d be bored stiff waiting for black folks to rise up so I could join them. Since I’m already ready to rise up and they ain’t, it seems to me I should rise up first and let them follow me.” (Walker, A, 1985: p. 196). Ruth still has the ability to dream and she is outspoken in her efforts to make a change whilst Grange is passive, tethered too much to the pain of the past. Birch implies that Ruth’s ability to foresee change is a direct result of developments such as televised marches, a generational shift in overcoming prejudice and claiming black rights. She states that, ‘Ruth can anticipate a political as well as an emotional liberation.’ (Birch, E.L, 1994: p. 202) and this is the very emancipation she seeks.

Alice Walker encourages the audience to consider the implications of oppression and prejudice upon all those affected, including the perpetrators themselves. She challenges the reader to partake in a complicated dialogue about accountability, activism and “real” change. As readers in the present day, with the momentum of the George Floyd catalyst behind us, it is worth considering that though much has changed, and we can plead ourselves products of a more “liberated” and “progressive” world, there is so much more to be done. For a book that was written in 1970, much of the thematic content and commentary on society is still as applicable in the present day, which is a disturbing reality-check for those who believe lynching, apartheid and racial prejudice are but memories of a distant past.

blm

Bibliography

Walker, A. (1985). The Third Life of Grange Copeland. London: The Women’s Press Ltd.

Birch, E.L. (1994). Black American Women’s Writing (A Quilt of Many Colours). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

BOOK REVIEW: The Stand

Last night, I finally finished the girthy Stephen King novel that I started more than a month ago. I’ve been recommended this book on several occasions by people who share an interest in either King’s back-catalogue of absolute bangers or an appreciation of dystopian and post-apocalyptic fiction in general. Regarded as one of King’s strongest works, The Stand is an epic piece of literature at 1300+ pages (I have the full edition, which was published years after the heavily cut original) and therefore not for the faint-hearted. Just a warning before I go on: as much as this is a book I’d recommend to any readers of this blog (all three of you), it’s worth pointing out that the themes may be upsetting for some, with the striking comparisons to the reality we’re living in right now. So, if you’re trying to deal with this quarantine/isolation business by avoiding all talk of pandemics, avert your eyes or click on another random blog. But if, like me, there’s a morbidity and Sertraline-pumped interest in the encompassing darkness of fiction, read on.

Set in 1990, The Stand begins as many dystopian reads do: a secret base, a hushed-up government operation, an engineered virus designed as biological warfare and a panicked employee who is responsible for accidentally releasing the virus from the secure compound in which it has lived since discovery. The virus reaches the outside world. The world is never the same again.
Capable of constantly mutating, and therefore effectively resisting any cure, ‘Captain Tripps’ wreaks its havoc by spreading like wildfire, and subsequently goes on to claim the lives of the majority of Earth’s population. The Stand looks at the impact of the man-made disaster, and the ripples of effect felt by a number of survivors dotted across the ghostly remains of America.

Of course, this isn’t just any generic take on what the world would be like if just a small population remained. I’ve read a few books which have followed this angle and watched many films/TV series (the initial series of The Walking Dead will always live in my heart) but King does his thing better than most. He works his magic as a natural storyteller, allowing us to see the world through the eyes of numerous characters before, during and after the catastrophe hits.

The Stand is fundamentally a story of survival and faith, which sees its cast of characters ponder the big existential question as well as theology, as they try to assemble the jigsaw pieces of what’s left behind. There’s so many enigmatic figures: ‘Trashcan Man’, Frannie Goldsmith, Mother Abigail, Nick Andros, Larry Underwood, Glen Bateman and ‘The Walkin Dude’ to name but a few. King has this magical ability to make each person as real as your neighbour, or the person you used to walk past every day on your commute. They’re living, breathing figures that transcend the page and hold their own anxieties as to what will become of humanity and what shape the new world might take.
There are underlying themes of redemption and faith, at the heart of the novel. Powerful characterisation is one tool, but one of King’s greatest skills is interweaving the delicate plot-lines of each character, as they intersect along their journey to either the East (the hub for ‘Good’) or the West (a more brooding collective of ‘Evil’). The world King builds is complete, with constant references to both the individual story arcs and the overall story of picking a side, choosing something to stand for.

Survivors are left to their own devices, they are responsible for preserving notions of democracy and society, for bequeathing memories of a world that their children will never know in their lifetimes. This psychological shift draws parallels with the attitude changes I’ve seen in people who have been transformed by the virus, and the repercussions of forced lock-down. Some people seem humbled by the effects of perspective: of seeing what’s important when the hum-drum of capitalism and consumerism shuts down and normality, as it has always been known, is disrupted. The Stand makes for interesting reading material at a time like this: it calls upon our tendencies as humans to live cyclically and to repeat the patterns of what has already been, but also calls upon our imaginations to picture what could be. I would definitely say that this book is powerful more so because it is especially tangible now more than ever, as a reader.
The Stand was a risky choice of reading material in that the COVID-19 pandemic we are experiencing seems to be identical, in many ways, to that of ‘Captain Tripps’. The viruses themselves are distinguishable from one another, but the human responses to the threat of a pandemic are difficult to separate into ‘fiction’ and ‘reality’.

King does an incredible job of depicting how people interact in the face of disaster and how they cope with the trauma of it, in its aftermath, and this seems eerily comparable to that which we have seen so far during the COVID-19 pandemic, and that which we are yet, still, to encounter when it leaves.

I’m genuinely upset to have finally finished The Stand, primarily because it’s been such a great accompaniment since the day lock-down officially began and because it’s also weirdly given me some strange sense of clarity and hope. I guess some people might feel worse, reading about a situation so similar to what they’re experiencing in real life, but for me it was a reminder that we can withstand things beyond what we believe we are capable of.